The OKC-9/11 Connection: Hijacker Sightings Oklahoma Authorities Ignored

Jan 31, 2012 | Events & Assassinations, WAR: By Design

Oklahoma Gazette cover story on the OKC and September 11 connection

Oklahoma City Researchers Uncovered an Unexpected Connection

Oklahoma City-based researchers Chris Emery and Holland Van den Nieuwenhof reportedly stumbled upon information linking several September 11 hijackers to central Oklahoma locations while conducting unrelated research into the 1995 Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building bombing. The discovery, which they described as almost accidental, placed multiple hijackers in the Oklahoma City area in the days immediately preceding the September 11 attacks.

Witness Accounts and Signed Affidavits

According to reports first aired on the Deadline Live radio program hosted by Jack Blood out of Austin, Texas, Mohamed Atta and as many as five of the 19 hijackers were reportedly seen in Oklahoma City between September 6 and September 8, 2001. Multiple witnesses provided signed affidavits confirming these encounters.

The hijackers allegedly identified by witnesses alongside Atta in Oklahoma included Abdulaziz Alomari, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, Ahmed Alnami, and Hamza Alghamdi. These individuals were among those officially named in the September 11 Commission Report as participants in the attacks.

Questions About the Official Timeline

The presence of multiple hijackers in Oklahoma City just days before the attacks raised questions about the official timeline and whether investigators had fully explored all domestic movements of the accused plotters. Critics pointed out that the Oklahoma City connection received minimal coverage from major media outlets despite the existence of signed witness statements.

The overlap between research into the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the September 11 attacks also drew attention from those who had long argued that both events deserved deeper independent investigation. Whether the Oklahoma City sightings represented a meaningful intelligence gap or had a more mundane explanation remained a subject of debate among researchers and journalists who followed the story.

Related Posts