Sea Shepard Launches Operation Zero Tolerance
SHOCKER: Vaccines found to be absolutely useless, manipulated ‘research’ explored
Election 2012 Updates – Obama Wins?
Colorado’s Voters approve Recreational Marijuana
DARPA Robots get nimble – Skynet beefs up
Baltimore Rolls out 24/7 Audio Spying on Public Transit to ‘combat crime’
Show Transcript
Election Night 2012
Welcome to Revealing Talk Radio, this is your host Max on the Decrypted Matrix. It is November 6th, Election Day, a very exciting Election Day. It looks like we may have a projected winner right now. CNN has called it for Obama — Barack Obama, a second term president. Whether that really turns out to be the case, for those of you who were tuning in last night, we reviewed the show from ThatIsTheAssassins.org, an absolutely magnificent show. If you haven’t tuned into that one, you’ve got to go to the archives and check out last night’s show. Remember, remember the fifth of November.
So there is the projected winner. Obama looks like he might just be the next President of the United States. I was just talking with my friends earlier today and realized this could be a great way to stir people up. The question is, what if they were going to call Obama early and we find out tomorrow, maybe the next day, that there were extra votes that turned up or something was miscounted? It looks like Romney supporters are actually in the water right now. This is the radical scenario of course. Maybe it will be Obama and maybe it will be smooth sailing from here, right? Well, maybe. But we must stay vigilant. We must consider that anything at all is possible.
Sea Shepherd Operations
We are going to talk a little bit about Sea Shepherd. Now Sea Shepherd — their new operations this year have been really incredible. Their most recent operation was called Operation Zero Tolerance. If any of you have been watching Whale Wars on Animal Planet, you know what these guys do. They go down to Antarctica every year and they intercept the Japanese whaling fleet to protect the whales. They use nonviolent direct action, putting themselves and their ships between the harpoon ships and the whales.
Paul Watson, the founder and captain of Sea Shepherd, has been doing this for decades. He was one of the founding members of Greenpeace before breaking away to form Sea Shepherd because he felt Greenpeace was not doing enough with direct action. The Japanese whaling fleet claims they are conducting scientific research, but it is commercial whaling plain and simple. They are slaughtering whales in a whale sanctuary.
Sea Shepherd has been incredibly effective. In recent seasons, they have cut the Japanese catch by significant margins. The Japanese fleet has had to leave early because Sea Shepherd’s tactics have been so disruptive to their operations. They use their ships to block the slipway of the factory ship where the whales are hauled aboard. They deploy small boats to get between the harpoon vessels and the whales. It is really inspiring work.
The new vessel they acquired, the Sam Simon, has added to their fleet capabilities. They are expanding their operations beyond just the Southern Ocean whale campaigns. They are now doing campaigns to protect dolphins, sharks, and other marine life around the world. They have operations in the Faroe Islands to stop the grindadrap, the mass killing of pilot whales. They also have campaigns off the coast of Africa to stop illegal fishing and poaching.
Vaccine Fraud and the Exposed Mythology
Now we are going to get into the topic of tonight’s show, which is vaccine fraud. There are studies that expose the exposed mythology of the vaccine industry. A researcher named Lisa Jackson from the Group Health Center in Seattle tackled the biggest question in flu vaccine research. She looked at whether the flu vaccine actually reduces mortality among the elderly, who are most commonly the demographic pushed to get the vaccine.
She used a statistical method to identify something called the “healthy user effect.” She looked through years of medical data covering 72,000 people age 65 or older, noted the record of who received flu shots and who did not, then compared the death rates for all causes outside of the flu season. Guess what? The vaccines made no difference in mortality. What she found blows a hole right through the vaccination industry. She found that even outside the flu season, the death rate was 60 percent higher among those who did not get vaccines than among those who did. In other words, even when you take the flu season completely out of the equation, elderly people who don’t get vaccines have other lifestyle factors that make them far more likely to die from lots of other causes.
She also found that this so-called “healthy user effect” explains the entire apparent benefit that continues to be attributed to vaccines. This finding demonstrates that the flu vaccine may not have a beneficial effect whatsoever in reducing mortality.
How well received were these particular studies, you ask? Quoted from the story: “Jackson’s papers are beautiful,” says Tom Jefferson, who was a professor of global health at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., an internationally recognized expert in influenza and vaccines. But the epidemiology experts gave their classic response. Their studies were carefully done and the tests were getting rave reviews from professionals in the industry, yet many pro-vaccine experts simply refused to believe the results. Of course, because it conflicts with existing beliefs in vaccines.
The Journal of the American Medical Association refused to publish her research, even stating that to accept these results would be “to say that the earth is flat.” Which just goes to show you how deeply ingrained the current vaccine mythology is in the minds of conventional medical practitioners. They simply cannot imagine that vaccines don’t work. They dismiss any evidence, even good evidence, demonstrating that fact. This is what makes the vaccine industry a cult rather than a science. Jackson’s papers were finally published in 2006 in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
Vaccine Shortages Prove They Never Worked
Vaccine shortages are now proving they never worked in the first place. The history of the flu vaccine reveals huge gaps in current vaccination mythology. For example, in 2004, vaccine production was low and there was a shortage of vaccines — a 40 percent reduction. Yet mortality rates did not rise during the flu season. Clearly, if vaccines actually worked, then a year when the vaccine was not even administered to 40 percent of the people who normally get it should have resulted in a huge and statistically significant increase in mortality rates. The death rates should have filled the morgues, but they didn’t. You know why? Because flu vaccines don’t work in the first place.
Now the history of flu vaccines shows there were two years in which the formulated flu vaccine was a total mismatch to the widely circulating influenza strains. These years were 1968 and 1997. In both of these years, the flu vaccine had no protective effect for the easily mismatched virus. In effect, nobody was properly vaccinated. In other words, nobody in those years got real protection. The vaccine they got was the wrong one — a total mismatch to the circulating virus.
So knowing this, if the vaccine itself is effective at reducing death rates, then we should have once again seen a huge spike in the death rates during those two years, right? If the vaccine reduces death rates by 50 percent as is claimed by vaccine manufacturers, then these two years in which the vaccine companies completely missed the mark should have produced huge spikes in winter death rates. But what really happened? Nothing. Nothing notable. Not a spike. Nothing. Death rates did not rise at all. If vaccines really work to save lives, then the fewer people you vaccinate, the higher the death rates you should see, right? No, that is not the case.
Flu Vaccines Only Work on People Who Don’t Need Them
Back in 1989, only 15 percent of over-65 people got vaccinated against the flu. Today, thanks to the big vaccine push, over 65 percent are vaccinated, and yet amazingly, death rates among the elderly have not gone down during flu season. In fact, some argue they have even gone up. When vaccine promoters and CDC officials are challenged about the 50 percent mortality reduction claim, they invoke authority and attack the messenger. They are simply not willing to consider the possibility that flu vaccines simply do not work.
Scientists who question the vaccine mythology are routinely shunned by the medical establishment. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration is an epidemiologist who questions the claims made around flu vaccines. The backlash against Jefferson has been so dogmatic, you would think he was advocating stealing babies, said a colleague. The backlash against this person at the Cochrane Collaboration was enormous. Jefferson is one of the world’s best-informed researchers on the flu vaccine. He leads a team of researchers who have examined hundreds of vaccine studies. “The vast majority of studies were deeply flawed,” says Jefferson. “‘Rubbish’ is not a scientific term, but I think it is the term that applies” to these government-funded, establishment-funded studies.
So folks, flu vaccines only work on people who don’t need them. That is the punchline. The way the flu vaccine works is it causes the immune system to respond by building influenza antibodies. However, as Jefferson points out, only healthy people produce a good antibody response to the vaccine. It is precisely the unhealthy people — the ones who have compromised immune systems, for whom the vaccine was most intended, who are most at risk of being harmed or killed by the influenza — but the vaccines don’t work for them. So vaccines only work in people who don’t need them. Because the flu vaccine is designed to make the body respond by building influenza antibodies, and unhealthy people don’t do that very well enough to properly build influenza antibodies. In other words, the only people in whom the vaccine is effective are healthy people who don’t need the vaccine in the first place because they already have such a strong immune response.
At the same time, it is also accurate to say that vaccines don’t work at all in the very people who theoretically could benefit from them. Jefferson has called for randomized placebo-controlled studies of vaccines, but vaccine pushers are resisting these clinical trials. They call trials “unethical,” but in reality they know that a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study would reveal the complete failure of flu vaccines, and they would do anything to prevent such a trial from happening. So it is amazing — the drug pushers and vaccine advocates claim they have science on their side, but then they won’t submit their vaccines to any real science whatsoever.
Baltimore’s Audio Surveillance on Public Buses
Let us pop on over to our technology creep section. You wouldn’t be listening to the Decrypted Matrix if we didn’t talk about technology and conspiracy. Baltimore has now announced city-wide surveillance. They will be recording passengers and conversations on city buses. The surveillance society continues to grow as the city of Baltimore becomes the latest example of how this government operates in the name of so-called “public safety.”
According to the Baltimore Sun, city officials have now authorized the recording of private conversations on public buses to “investigate crimes, accidents, and for customer service.” That is the official reason. They have put signs to alert passengers that open mics are picking up every word they say.
In the first ten buses, they installed these systems toward the end of October. Eventually officials say they will expand the program to 340 buses, about half the fleet, by next summer. “We want to make people feel safe,” the paper says. The audio surveillance will be incorporated into the video surveillance systems already on these buses. There is no plausible explanation for how audio capabilities are supposed to enhance video surveillance. “We want to make sure people feel safe and these are some useful tools to keep our patrons safe,” said a Maryland Transit Administration chief. Audio completes the “information package” for investigators and first responders.
At this point, it is appropriate to remind readers that “public safety” is the excuse of choice for outright authoritarian moves by those who no longer feel constrained by the Constitution. The MTA transit authority basically said that they checked with the state Attorney General’s office on the legality of adding audio surveillance. The Attorney General’s office said it was legal based on a 2000 appeals court decision in which a panel ruled such recordings did not violate wiretapping laws. No word on how public eavesdropping complies with a law originally designed to regulate wiretapping, but the use of tortured logic to justify unconstitutional measures is not a new tactic for these authoritarians.
The American Civil Liberties Union weighed in. David Rocah of the ACLU Maryland chapter was flabbergasted by the plan, which he says is being implemented as a pilot program after a similar proposal was rejected by the state’s highest-ranking transportation official and the General Assembly three times in 2009. “People don’t want or need to have their private conversations recorded by the MTA as a condition of riding a bus,” Rocah told the paper. “A significant number of people have no viable alternative to riding a bus and they should not be forced to give up their privacy rights.”
The MTA says they receive anywhere from 45 to 200 calls a day from bus drivers reporting everything from unruly passengers to conflicts. A commander of the MTA police technical services division said video is a very useful tool in helping to solve crimes, but essentially he wants to take away the witness’s choice not to get involved. He said the audio helps when witnesses walk away, are reluctant to cooperate, or give conflicting accounts — they can go to the recording to fill in missing information. Translation: they want to force city residents to get involved in investigations even if they would otherwise choose not to, say for personal safety reasons. No word on whether police offer such unwilling witnesses 24/7 protection for as long as necessary.
Other area transportation systems have chosen a different route and have decided against audio surveillance, which is encouraging. Senator Jim Brochin, a Baltimore County Democrat on the state Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, said there are “absolutely no grounds to do this. If we can’t get them to change their minds, we will deal with this in the next session.” Let us hope that is not just hot air. If you are a listener out there in Baltimore, let your voice be heard. Contact us at DecryptedMatrix.com.
DARPA Robots and Emerging Surveillance Technology
That is not all the technology creep we have. There is a new video showing a very creepy robot from DARPA. Boston Dynamics, funded by DARPA, is showing off more of the abilities of their robot prototype. As seen in the video, this is the predecessor to what will be competing in an upcoming autonomous robots obstacle challenge. These things can navigate over holes, climb up stairs, and jump over gaps.
Skynet-style technology is supposedly being developed to assist in disaster response, although with the rate that unmanned aerial vehicles, drones, and autonomous scout vehicles are being deployed, you can pretty much guarantee that these robots will eventually one day see combat and will enable the police state. These things are moving around obstacles. The robot stands on two feet, bounces and balances itself between walls, climbs over tables, and jumps over gaps. These robots now have decision-making capability, improved mobility, and increased dexterity. So the reality of outrunning a Terminator to save your life, going up the stairs so it cannot follow you behind — that scenario might actually come to fruition. Boston Dynamics certainly has something to do with that.
We see time and time again the weaponization of what would be really awesome and revolutionary technology. It is scary. The military-industrial complex at all times wants soldiers that will never ever question orders. And what could be better than a robot that has all the capabilities of the human soldier? Consider that if some of these things were on our shores, connected to the internet, they would take their commands immediately and they would fire on innocent civilians if they were told to.
Speaking of creepy technology — fingerprint scanning from a distance. Cameras are now high enough resolution that your fingerprints can be snatched from 10, 20, maybe even 30 feet away without your knowledge. Your retinas and your eyeballs can be tracked. Your unique body signature — there is even data technology to tap into your unique body frequency, almost as if the body was built with its own radio frequency identifier. Biometric surveillance is getting more invasive by the day, and it is something everyone should be aware of.
