Moon Monday! After Weekend News & Highlights – Moon History Anomalies, Inconsistencies, and Crazy Facts. Historical Explanations, Scientific Observations, Research, Acoustic Testing, plus ‘Whats on the Dark-Side, and why does it have one?’
Show Transcript
The Moon: An Anomalous Satellite
Our most dominant feature in the night sky, the moon inspires wonder and debate. The past few decades have offered new understanding but also new mysteries, and a great number of questions still remain unanswered about our natural satellite.
We rely on it for tides and order, and we see it as part of our natural world. But when we begin to analyze the physical qualities of this familiar neighbor, many details suggest that the moon may not be a natural body at all, and may not have formed naturally. Where does this theory originate? It was first proposed in the nineteen sixties by Russian scientists, and later picked up by investigators and colleagues who were intrigued by this hypothesis. The idea contains some really compelling principles once you realize the curious characteristics of our lunar companion.
Size, Orbit, and Physical Anomalies
For starters, compared to other planets in our solar system, our moon is really about one quarter the size of Earth, and that turns out to be a considerable anomaly. Other planets have moons, sure, but with their weaker gravitational influence, the smaller planets like Mercury, Venus, and Pluto don’t have similarly sized moons. On the other hand, compare this with the immense Jupiter or Saturn, which have several moons, all tiny satellites. Jupiter’s moons measure maybe the size of large planets, but our own seems to be rather rare.
Another interesting detail is the moon’s distance from Earth. From our perspective, the moon appears to be equal in size to our sun. This curious coincidence is most apparent during a solar eclipse. Notice that the moon completely covers the sun. All you can see is the halo or ring around it. The sun is so far away that it takes about ten minutes for light to travel that distance. The moon is something like two hundred and forty thousand miles away, and the sun is probably four or five hundred times further. Yet from our perspective, they are exactly the same size. How is that possible?
The moon has a nearly perfect circular orbit. It does not behave like other satellites, which tend toward a more elliptical path. That in itself is pretty interesting. Here is a peculiar mystery: the gravitational center of the moon is nearly six thousand feet closer to us than its geometric center. With such a significant discrepancy, scientists remain unable to explain how the moon manages to maintain its nearly perfect circular orbit when all its weight is off-center by six thousand feet.
Craters, Composition, and the Hollow Moon Theory
We have all seen photos of the moon and its craters. The vast majority of objects that fall toward Earth’s surface are either completely dissolved or significantly diminished by several miles of our atmosphere. Without any atmosphere, the moon has no such protection. But when you consider the depth of these craters, they are remarkably shallow in comparison to their circumference. The moon possesses some exceedingly resistant material that prevents deeper penetration. Even craters over a hundred and eighty miles in diameter do not go deeper than four miles. The argument being made is that these craters should be four or five times as deep, which would be more consistent with solid rock.
Those Russian scientists proposed that perhaps the moon may be made of a titanium frame. In fact, it has been verified that the lunar crust has an extraordinary level of titanium. That layer of titanium is estimated to be about twenty miles thick.
The moon’s density has been found to be about sixty percent of Earth’s density. Studies indicate and demonstrate that the data suggests the moon is hollow and relatively rigid. Several scientists were as bold to say that this means it is artificial. The composition of the superficial layers that have been identified led scientists to declare that the moon appears to be a planet that was formed in reverse, which is another argument for the artificial construction hypothesis.
Researchers have been able to send lasers and acoustic signals to the moon and get an acoustic resonance back like what you would expect from a hollow body. You send a signal out there, and it rings. The moon rings when you send an acoustic signal off of it. A few different researchers have talked about this, and explanations are lacking.
Lunar Oceans and Geographical Asymmetry
There are so-called lunar oceans on the moon’s surface. These extensions are believed to be hardened lava. But a lot of the research here says that the moon was always a cold body. If so, how does that explain the lunar oceans? There is some conflicting information and mystery here.
There is gravitational inconsistency on the moon. For the crew of Apollo, they noticed that their craft was being pulled when flying near the lunar ocean areas. Gravity seems to mysteriously exhibit a greater influence over those regions.
The far side of the moon, the side that cannot be seen from Earth, has many craters, mountains, and geographic upheaval. Yet the side facing Earth is where we find the great majority of the flat oceans. Why are eighty percent of the lunar oceans found only on one side? We only ever see one side of the moon because it is locked into orbit around Earth. It does not rotate from our perspective. It is as if you tied a string around a tennis ball and held that string against your chest while spinning around in a circle. You would only see that same side of the ball because it takes one full rotation of itself as it rotates around you. From your perspective, you are actually not seeing it rotate at all. It is locked into orbit, and that is completely unnatural. There are only a few clearly documented cases of this in Jupiter’s and Saturn’s moons.
Three Theories of the Moon’s Origin
Over the past century, there have been three main theories about the moon’s origin. One was that the moon was actually a part of the Earth and broke away. Another theory believed the moon had been formed at the same time as Earth, emerging from the same cloud of primordial nebula. Neither of these hypotheses, however, can address the incredible differences found in the nature of both bodies.
The third theory proposes that during its wandering through space, the moon was attracted to and captured into Earth’s orbit. The problems with this theory are that the moon’s orbit is almost perfectly circular, and given its large size, a captured body in orbit would be expected to have a more eccentric orbit, at least something elliptical. Another problem with all three theories is their inability to justify the high angular momentum between the moon and Earth.
There is a fourth explanation, perhaps the most incredible of all. Maybe the various anomalies of the moon can best be explained by the hypothesis that it was constructed as a satellite, not by natural processes but by intelligent design, by beings not subject to the same considerations that one would expect from bodies created by natural processes billions of years ago. Plenty of scientists out there have accepted that theory as no less valid than the others.
Researchers and Insider Testimony
Stewart Swerdlow, who was one of the Montauk Project and government mind control survivors, has been trying to flip the script to help people deprogram themselves from these programs and technologies used against them. In his experience, he was able to learn some information about the moon. He says absolutely it is artificial. He says that there are artificial structures and bases on the moon that the government has had access to for a long time. But he is not the only one.
Richard C. Hoagland is an American author who has been around for a while and has been very consistent. His website is Enterprise Mission. He talks about hyperdimensional physics, Mars, the face on Mars, and the conspiracy around the moon. He talks about how NASA is suppressing knowledge of ancient civilization on the moon, and that advanced technology of that civilization is lying around on the moon’s surface. He has reportedly alleged that the twelve moonwalkers, who would be well qualified to confirm the existence of ruins, artifacts, and glass structures, had their memories selectively edited through hypnosis so they no longer remember seeing evidence of lunar civilization.
Hoagland also explains a NASA connection to Egyptian mythology. He says NASA’s name will strive to pay homage to the Egyptian gods Isis, Osiris, and Horus. He theorizes that NASA has preferential arrangements for key space missions to occur when certain stars are at specific observations at thirty-three degrees, nineteen and a half, zero, negative nineteen and a half, and negative thirty-three degrees.
Another insider, a Disclosure Project witness, was talking about how in the early sixties he was in a NASA lab. A lab technician was developing photos from a lunar orbiter and showed him pictures of artificial structures on the back side of the moon, the dark side that we never get to see. He described rectangles, cylinders, bridges, oblong shapes, domed structures, and what looked like cities. He said you could absolutely not mistake them. These were not ambiguous. They were absolute artificial structures.
The Moon Landing Debate
So what about the moon landing? There is a conspiracy around whether the moon landing was faked. Here is my personal take. I do not personally believe that they could have made it to the moon with the technology that they say they used. I do, however, believe that they have absolutely gotten to the moon multiple times, probably as many times as they want, but using advanced technology that they are not willing to admit or recognize publicly.
The big moon landing buildup was really a financial push. It was a farming operation. It was a PR campaign. The folks in government were not really willing to risk using weak technology when they needed the milestone so badly and had to beat the Russians. They may have messed up and risked the astronauts on live television because they just rushed it. So it looks like they wanted the funding, they wanted the prestige of the space race, and they wanted to make sure they won in the process.
They did not want to use the technology they really had to get to the moon because it involves anti-gravity propulsion and free energy. At the same time, they would have to acknowledge interactions with other beings, because every time they go into space, their vehicles are approached by UFOs and other beacons of light. These things come out of nowhere and zip off.
You can see these videos on YouTube. There is the infamous footage of when the crew had to cut loose a fourteen-kilometer-long tether that broke free. Within minutes, all these objects, like fireflies, came swarming around the tether and started investigating and moving around. You can hear the guys in the capsule just bewildered by what is going on outside.
Stanley Kubrick and Hidden Messages
Look into Stanley Kubrick’s movies. There is a documentary about secrets hidden in Kubrick’s films. After seeing it, I will admit there might be something to the theory that they may have actually gotten Stanley Kubrick involved in filming the moon landing. It looks like he may have been involved, but when he realized what was going on, he integrated elements of the moon landing into a couple of his movies. I do not want to give spoilers, but look into the Kubrick odyssey and then decide for yourself whether the moon landings were faked.
