9/11 Events Decrypted: How is it possible that a rag-tag band of half-baked ‘terrorists’ penetrated the most sophisticated military airspace defense system in the WORLD, four times in a single morning? Take a closer look at the actual conspiracy-theory (ie, the ‘Official Version’ as which can not be proven), versus actual reported events which include: multiple explosions, Military planes, strange Orbs, Manipulated news footage, precision targeted airliners with impossible trajectories, suspicious stock trades, emptied Gold Vaults, billion dollar insurance policies and crime scene evidence destroyed immediately with NO investigation. The list goes on — tune in for the full story and little known facts, uncovered.
Show Transcript
Introduction and Dedication
Thank you for joining us. Revealing Talk Radio presents Decrypted Matrix with your host Max. Thank you for joining tonight for this special dedicated episode to the victims of the unfortunate tragedy that took place exactly eleven years ago today. It is midnight in New York City right now, and they are realizing about this time on September 12th that it was a different world, a new world, what some circles might even call the introduction of the New World Order.
So tonight we are ripping the matrix of conspiracy and analyzing the cover-up of the September 11th attacks. It is the JFK of this generation. It is the conspiracy of our time. The official version has proven to not hold up when you look at the facts. Even the behavior of those who are supposed to provide the answers, the destruction of evidence, the takeover and removal of all the facts regarding the events — the structural evidence, the collapse, the skill set of the hijackers. Take all those things out of the equation and just look at the behavior and response of the administration when the public asks for and demands answers they deserve. It is no different than talking to a child. You do not even need to know if they took the candy bar. You do not need to see the chocolate on their fingers or around their mouth to know they took the candy bar. You can tell by questioning them. If they are abrasive about it and they are obviously not providing answers, based on their behavior, they are probably lying to you. A repeated pattern of this would guarantee that they are lying to you, with no evidence required.
Special shout-out goes to any listeners or fans of the work who were directly or indirectly affected by losing a loved one. We could not imagine the pain of that loss. I feel the best way to pay tribute to those who lost their lives is by doing a full and thorough investigation, spreading the truth and facts that we learn about any possible government complicity or manipulation of this event, which certainly seems to be the case even at a high level. Anyone who says that they do not see a conspiracy here is willfully looking the other way and not willing to question the official version of events, which is really just a house of cards. So many have torn apart this house of cards in documentaries.
The Official Version as Conspiracy Theory
We are fortunate to be here providing a documented record of what we absolutely know that counters this official version of events, which is really nothing more than a conspiracy theory. A conspiracy theory is something that cannot be proven; it is merely an idea based upon weak circumstantial evidence. The official version of events, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly that. Nineteen half-baked hijacker terrorists using box cutters and a cell phone and laptop penetrated the most sophisticated military air defense system in the world four times in a single morning.
The inconsistencies abound with this official version. Several of the hijackers turned up alive afterwards, recorded in news reports overseas as being alive after the 9/11 attacks, yet this was never questioned by the 9/11 Commission Report. There is a laundry list of things that the 9/11 Commission Report just decided were irrelevant or not important enough to cover. One of those things is the collapse of World Trade Center 7 — that third building that collapsed later in the day that just happened to hold SEC files on all the investigations they were conducting. Also, supposedly insiders said that there were records of how certain dealings were on the books and being tracked that were kept in World Trade Center 7.
There is speculation about what plane was actually destined for World Trade Center 7. Regarding Shanksville, the footage shows a big hole in the ground with no wreckage whatsoever — no blood, no body parts, no people, nothing. The official version is that a plane crashed in Shanksville. Then you have the weight of insiders, someone like John Lear for example, a former US Air Force pilot who is still alive to this day. He has been interviewed by Project Camelot. He will tell you about the use of advanced technology. The plane or drone headed for World Trade Center 7 lost contact with it and they had to abort, so their plans to bring down World Trade Center 7 had to proceed from the inside anyway, because it held alleged evidence of SEC investigations.
Foreknowledge and Potential Plots
We have evidence from David Chase Taylor of TruthOrDie.org. He says that there was a plot to run a 9/11-style attack at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, which he claims was exposed at the last minute and so it never actually happened. He says that Obama was desperately trying to orchestrate a major false flag operation within the United States. Using the rationale that approval ratings were at an all-time low, he describes motivations for such an event. He references how a Harvard professor, Robert Shapiro, made clear that a terror attack could rescue a presidency.
Taylor was saying the evidence indicates a major false flag involving an anthrax-style attack at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, which was scheduled for September 6th, 2012. The goal of the attack, he claims, was to support various agendas including martial law and civil unrest within the United States. According to his information, the plot was to be blamed on militia men from Georgia, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. An airplane described as high-tech would carry weaponized material, possibly anthrax, and fly into North Carolina undetected and nose-dive into a crowd of 74,000 people scheduled at Bank of America Stadium.
We know these war games and exercises were going on in secret around the Democratic National Convention — command center planning on multiple government scenarios regarding threats to both candidates. David Chase Taylor was claiming insider knowledge that this plot was somehow stopped.
Recommended Documentaries
Here is a short list of documentaries worth checking out. Loose Change, parts one, two, and three — an excellent expose of the inconsistencies, probably the one many listeners and fans might be familiar with. Zeitgeist is another one that turned into a multi-part documentary series. 9/11 Blueprint for Truth is a pretty awesome documentary that takes a really close look at things that do not add up. In Plain Sight is a great one for close-up footage breakdown of the planes hitting the buildings. Also worth watching: 9/11 Ripple Effect, Mysteries, Wake Up Call, Fabled Enemies which gets into the idea of manufactured terrorism and the perfect patsy, Impossible Collapse which talks about the structural inconsistencies, Truth Rising, 9/11 Chronicles, and Minions of Darkness.
Then there are the fake documentaries being pushed to overwrite history and create a new version of events. The “Let’s Roll” story of Flight 93 — that story has changed multiple times and there is no plane wreckage at Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The “Let’s Roll” story of Flight 93 is really just propaganda — the idea that some guys with box cutters would allow you to take over a plane while you are the pilot and just give up control. Then we have the Seal Team Six situation. Disney Corporation came in right away and bought the rights to “Seal Team Six” so you can bet there will be a propaganda film about how bin Laden was taken out. We also have Act of Valor, which looks like another propaganda film for the Navy SEALs, and the Pat Tillman situation where they manipulated his story.
Bush Administration Insiders Speak Out
Morgan Reynolds is a professor at Texas A&M University, former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas, Texas. He served as Chief Economist for the Department of Labor in 2001-2002 during George W. Bush’s first term. Reynolds in 2005 started gaining public attention as the first prominent government official to publicly claim that 9/11 was an inside job. He is now a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. So Bush’s own Chief Economist is saying 9/11 was an inside job.
Richard Falk, former professor of international law at Princeton and an expert on human rights, made comments in a blog post noting that the mainstream media was not acknowledging the well-known doubts about the official version of events. He described the official version as a cover-up containing gaps and contradictions. An organization called UN Watch, which describes itself as an independent Geneva-based watchdog organization, condemned his comments in a letter to the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon at the time, calling for his removal for his post. They called his comments an insult to the victims of the attacks and their families and loved ones. But I would say the real insult to the victims and their families is perpetuating a lie. Propagating a false version of history that protects the real perpetrators is the real crime.
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Cover-Up
The 9/11 Commission Report is much like the Warren Commission in the JFK assassination — government-appointed bureaucracy of internal government members that would investigate and act as counsel on putting together a briefing of what actually happened. Much like the Warren Commission was set up by the people who were responsible, you see that exact same behavior with the 9/11 Commission Report.
I quote: “The US government made a decision not to tell the truth about what happened.” This is from John Farmer Jr., senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission. Also, it should be noted that six out of the ten 9/11 Commission members have gone on record since to admit that there was indeed a US government cover-up.
The Commission Report was based on evidence obtained through torture, and that evidence was destroyed — the destroyed CIA tapes, the waterboarding. There is no mention of World Trade Center 7 in the report. No mention of the NORAD drills that had all the fighter jets conveniently not where they needed to be to respond. Never before had it taken 45 minutes to an hour to intercept a rogue aircraft — typically within minutes a plane would be intercepted. When Payne Stewart’s plane lost cabin pressure and everyone lost consciousness, within ten or eleven minutes they had fighter jets on it trying to escort it down. Yet on 9/11, four planes flew off course for nearly an hour and none were intercepted.
No investigation into the funding of 9/11, which came through Mohammed Atta. He got $100,000 from Pakistani intelligence through General Mahmoud Ahmad, the head of Pakistani intelligence, the ISI — basically Pakistan’s CIA. Ahmad was meeting with Bush officials the week before 9/11. He was also the primary source of funding to Mohammed Atta. The Commission actually said the funding was of “little practical significance.”
As for the hijackers themselves — they were supposedly strict Muslims, yet they visited strip clubs, drank alcohol, and behaved exactly like CIA and FBI informants do when given money to carry out operations. No mention of Sibel Edmonds, the FBI translator with a Turkish background who was translating terrorist chatter and had picked up intelligence about the plot. She testified, but none of her testimony was included in the final report.
The simulated hijacked airliner exercises being run by NORAD and the Pentagon overlapped on the screens during the actual attack, muddying the waters so that nobody really knew which planes were really the ones under attack, which allowed them to slip under the radar. Bush and Cheney — they testified, but they insisted on testifying together, in private, with no records. How convenient. No investigation into the SEC records of insider trading that were destroyed. NIST released an updated model of the collapse of World Trade Center 1 and World Trade Center 7, but they will not release it because it would supposedly “jeopardize public safety.” The FBI determined that all results of the investigation be kept secret from the public — an attack on American soil where 3,000 Americans were killed, and the investigation results should not be available to the public.
Evidence of Controlled Demolition
The evidence we saw was typical of a controlled demolition in every respect. Here are ten major characteristics of a typical controlled demolition that match what happened at the World Trade Center.
Number one: sudden onset of destruction at the base of the structure. This was corroborated by a man who worked in the basement of the World Trade Center before the attacks took place. Seconds before, there were massive booms in the basement. This is where it is theorized that insiders had the place wired. There was molten metal at the bottom of the World Trade Center for months afterward. If a building simply collapses from fire onto itself, the fire would be on top of the debris because the fires were at the upper floor levels. But that is not what happened — there was molten steel at the base of the structures for months.
Number two: straight-down symmetrical collapse into a single footprint. Obviously that happened. Number three: demolition removes core support, which allows for number four — free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance. The path should provide great resistance, yet the buildings fell at free-fall speed because the demolition removed the core support.
Number five: the dismemberment of the steel structure. The steel beams appeared to be cut at angles. This is visible in wreckage photos, but of course they would not let you photograph or investigate — the wreckage was shipped off right away to be destroyed in China. They removed the evidence from the crime scene.
Number six: minimal damage to adjacent structures, which would otherwise be impossible. Number seven: sounds and flashes of explosives, seen in video evidence and corroborated by witness testimony and footage from that day. People described multiple explosions going off in the buildings, including explosions in the basement.
Number eight: enormous clouds of pulverized concrete. How would that be possible from a gravity collapse? Enormous clouds of pulverized concrete is a signature of controlled demolition. Number nine: visible squibs — explosive charges visible at the upper floors as the building falls, with floors exploding before the collapse wave reached that point.
Number ten: chemical evidence of incendiary charges, which is thermite. Thermite burns hotter than 2,200 degrees. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel. That is absolutely one of the biggest inconsistencies with the official version. There are professional architects and engineers who banded together as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who have investigated this and say it does not make sense.
Larry Silverstein had signed a new insurance policy for the entire World Trade Center complex nine months prior — a billion-dollar policy with a specific terrorist attack clause. That clause did not exist in the previous World Trade Center insurance policy but was inserted into the new one, which paid out billions.
Bin Laden, the Gold Heist, and Unanswered Questions
Bin Laden’s CIA connections are well documented. He was created and funded by the CIA to push the Soviets out of Afghanistan. His CIA code name was Tim Osman. There is documentation of this that has leaked.
No testimony from witnesses who heard multiple explosions inside the buildings during and after the attacks was included. All those people on record in videos describing what they saw — things that did not make sense, people saying it looked like a military plane hit the Pentagon — all of these conflicting reports, none of that testimony was included.
Then there is the gold heist. Billions of dollars in gold were supposed to be in the vaults underneath the World Trade Center. Those vaults were empty. Upon digging through the wreckage months later, they discovered the vaults that should have been filled with gold were empty. They did find an abandoned truck in the tunnels leading away from the towers with some gold bars, and they recovered a few million in gold, but what was supposed to be there was multi-billions in gold bars. Somebody knew what was going to happen and moved the gold ahead of time.
Regarding bin Laden’s killing — why would they kill the most valuable terrorist who supposedly had all this intelligence information? Why would they kill him if he was unarmed? And why would Seal Team Six not record and release the video? Then two dozen SEALs involved in that raid died a few weeks later in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan — each representing a multi-million dollar investment in training.
There is also the classroom video. The kids in the classroom with Bush are reciting the words “kite,” “hit,” “steel,” “plane,” and “must.” Meanwhile, Bush was told by Andrew Card that the country was under attack. And George H.W. Bush was meeting with members of the Bin Laden family at the Ritz-Carlton the night before.
Life changed for every American the following morning. We woke up to a different world, the one we live in now. Nobody could have foreseen what was coming, but eleven years later — predator drones, surveillance, the creation of robots for warfare — it is absolutely out of control. And what made it all possible was the JFK of this generation: the September 11th attacks.
