Anonymous – The Bankers Are The Problem
Bankers Are the Problem – Greed has become the driving force of systematic DEBT in throughout the world
Anonymous: Occupy The Planet
Anonymous Leaks Personal Details of Cop Who Pepper-Sprayed Wall Street Protesters
Anonymous is on the hunt for the cop featured in a videopepper-spraying Occupy Wall Street protesters for no apparent reason. They say they’ve found him, and are circulating a document with his and his family’s personal information. This could get ugly.
According to a document posted on Pastebin.com, the cop who blasted young women in the face with pepper spray in the now-iconic video above is NYPD Captain Deputy Inspector Anthony Bologna. Bologna was identified as the pepper-sprayer by a photographer who witnessed the incident and posted a blown-up image of his badge to his blog.
The Pastebin document, which has about 7,000 views at this writing contains Bologna’s name and possible phone numbers and addresses, along with a list of potential family member names. It reads:
You know who the innocent women were, now they will have the chance to know who you are. Before you commit atrocities against innocent people, think twice. WE ARE WATCHING!!! Expect Us!
According to a 2005 article in the Villager, Anthony Bologna has been with the NYPD for nearly 30 years. He was in charge of Lower Manhattan’s police precinct for five years, before becoming the “borough executive” of the Manhattan South Precinct in 2010.
What might Anonymous do with this information? One popular Anonymous twitter account asked: “Question: what kind of pizza do you think Antony Bologna would like?”—a reference to the group’s favored harassment tactic of sending a flood of pizzas to victims’ houses. If Bologna has any nude pics floating around he might want to clean those up, as Anonymous leaked nude pics of a BART spokesman during protests of San Francisco’s public transit police.
NYPD, which told the New York Times pepper spray was deployed “appropriately,” did not immediately return a request for comment.
Anonymous helps lead Wall Street protests
Cyber activists associated with Anonymous have been in the forefront of helping to organize and conduct protests against Wall Street bankers in New York City.
Rallying under the banner of #OCCUPYWALLSTREET, the demonstrators say they want to change America’s financial system for the better.
For example, Bill Steyerd, a Vietnam veteran from Queens, told The Guardian that #OCCUPYWALLSTREET is a “worthy cause because people on Wall Street are blood-sucking warmongers.”
Jason Ahmadi, who travelled from Oakland, California to attend the rally, said “a lot of us feel there is a large crisis in our economy and a lot of it is caused by the folks who do business here.”
Meanwhile, Robert Siegel, who is sleeping in a nearby park during the protest, told WCBS that working 8 years as a consultant for an investment bank was enough to turn him against the current Wall Street model.
“I just shuffled other people’s money around and took a cut. Nothing was being contributed. A lot was just being taken out.
”[I] watched the silliness compound on itself. At some point, I wanted a lifestyle that didn’t consist of going up to computers to deal with angry people.”
http://www.tgdaily.com/business-and-law-features/58550-anonymous-helps-lead-wall-street-protests
An Anonymous Message to NATO
404 FREEDOM NOT FOUND – Message From Anonymous On The IP Act
Underwater Structure Thought To Be Over 14,000 Years Old & Man-made
Graham Hancock – Quest for the Lost Civilization (1 of 14)
Stuxnet (HUNGRY BEAST)
This Type Of Police Brutality Needs To Stop: Ohio Officer Makes Death Threats & Goes Ape Sh*t!
On June 8, 2011 the following unfortunate arrest took place in Canton, OH. Notifying the policy when you have a firearm is required by Ohio Law, but when this individual with a thirty-day old license tries to do that he is repeatedly ordered to look away, shut up, or interrupted and “forced” to change what he is speaking about by the actions of an aggressive cop who maintains verbal control of the situation. A two man car dealing with three people put itself at risk when one officer started what appears to be an illegal search of the rear of the car without extracting or securing the driver – which would have given him an opportunity to notify. What follows is horrific example of a police officer losing all self-control, threatening to beat the female, threatening to beat the driver and eventually saying he should have executed him “and wouldn’t have lost any sleep over it” that night.” – Ohio. Submitted by http://www.facebook.com/thugmidget
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh3H5rOy2JKU98t8QW
How NYPD & Citizen Media are using Technology at Occupy Wall Street Protests
Even people who were indifferent about Occupy Wall Street protests are getting steamed about the violent crackdown on peaceful protesters because this is STILL the USA where American citizens have the Right to Assemble and the Right to Free Speech. IF the correct permits were not obtained, does that give NYPD the right to beat or mace peaceful protesters? Is America the new KGB police state, now officially being running by the rich and the Department of Fear? Citizen media is NOT a crime!
Despite horrifying videos of white-collar NYPD officers violently attacking peaceful protesters and photos of excessive violence and police brutality, this is still the USA where American citizens have a right to Freedom of Speech. As TechHerald reported, “if it bleeds, it leads” and everything changed on Saturday when something evil was in the air, blood was running down faces, and the fear department like Cold War KGB took over Wall Street. The NYPD used exceedingly violent tactics against peaceful protesters which earned the title of “The Arab Spring of The United States.” This weekend, the NYPD responded to thousands of people who showed up for Occupy Wall Street with “police state” measures.
Technology is shaping the events of Occupy Wall Street; last week Yahoo apologized for “accidentally” blocking anti-Wall Street protest emails. But still there was a mainstream media coverage blackout. Police, armed with cell phones, cameras and batons, are recording citizens; protesters are recording police; and the scene is set for facial recognition technology and potential police state surveillance as seen on Cryptome. NYPD is claiming technology via the tweaking of videos is what makes the police look bad, not actual police actions. As some protesters chanted, “Shame. Shame,” so do I call disputing that the hundreds of videos and photos from different angles could all have been altered.
On Saturday, police carried an orange mesh fencing through Union Square to corral protesters onto the sidewalks. My blood turned cold when I watched a video of a peaceful female protester screaming in pain after being sprayed by a white-collared police officer. The “macing of innocent women” tactic was called common ground between American and Iranian officials. The New York Times reported, “There were approximately 80 arrests, mainly for disorderly conduct by individuals who blocked vehicular and pedestrian traffic, but also for resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration and, in one instance, for assault on a police officer.”
Alternet reported, “Police sprayed peaceful protesters in the face with pepper spray, threw them to the ground and assaulted them with elbows, dragged a woman around by the hair, jumped over barricades to grab and rough up young people, and, when all was said and done, laughed to themselves triumphantly. This is exactly the sort of violence and brutality American authorities routinely condemn when perpetrated against non-violent civilians demonstrating for democracy in Middle Eastern dictatorships, even as they employ horrifying cruelty right here.”
According to Metro, NYPD Deputy Commissioner Paul Browne defended the decision to use pepper spray and blamed people for editing Occupy Wall Street videos to make the police look bad. Browne said, “Pepper spray was used once after individuals confronted officers and tried to prevent them from deploying a mesh barrier — something that was edited out or otherwise not captured on the video.” Then Browne warned, “Those who resist arrest can expect some measure of force will used.”
What’s next? Announcing citizen media is a crime?
There are good cops and bad cops, and you can see the difference between them as some of the NYPD in blue officers’ faces reflected shock and horror at violence displayed by their white-collared counterparts. Do you think the Occupy Wall Street 99% is only representing young Americans? An interview of one police-attacked-woman included her statement, “I’m here for my grandparents, who are too old to protest.”
A comment on the ABC article pointed out that the police may wield tasers and mace, but as was seen after the London riots, technology will be used to identify protesters.
Given the number of police holding video cameras, this is obviously a way to intimidate people who may think about joining a peaceful protest (not merely to “gather evidence” as police will claim). Of course NYPD is big on facial recognition technology, so people who might want to exercise their 1st Amendment RIGHTS are entered in a database for whatever purpose our “watchers” deem fit.
First reported as Homeland Security personnel then reported as Marines, there were allegedly over “100 Chemical and Biological Response Units stationed all around Liberty Park.” Another photo showed a member of the unit perhaps taunting Anon by wearing an Anonymous mask after images such as the one snapped by Andrew Shiue was seen on Public Intelligence. 
Again technology comes into play by live streaming of Occupy Wall Street and other information. For the record, I do not support the release of innocent people’s information, yet some techy folks are turning the technology surveillance around and hunting for the real name of “Officer Derp,” by showing an older photo from 2004 GOP Convention and again as well as a Pastebin doxing of the alleged real name for the NYPD Deputy Inspector as well as the reasons behind it. Then came numerous warning tweets, including this one, “Fair Warning, your attack on Inspector Bologna will prove you are terrorists! Badge shows 9/11 Hero, you show HAMAS!”
Technology like tweets and social networking definitely is playing a part in Occupy Wall Street . . . as is biometric tech in the form of retina scanning of detained protesters.
The terrorism-meets-technology theme was mentioned again. Another article mentions that the NYPD’s “state-of-the-art anti-terrorism system” for the last four years has included a weapon that could “bring down a rogue aircraft” and the “bullets can penetrate concrete cinder blocks.”
Even people who were indifferent about the Wall Street protests are getting steamed about the violent crackdown on peaceful protesters because this is still the USA where American citizens have the Right to Assemble and the Right to Free Speech. IF the correct permits were not obtained, does that give NYPD the right to beat or mace peaceful protesters? Judge for yourself via firsthand accounts of people from the front lines and video interviews taken in Liberty Plaza and posted as a message on Day Nine of Occupy Wall Street. It’s very scary, like Free Speech Zones in America are now run by the Department of Fear. If you see it, report NYPD misconduct.
Like this? Here’s more posts:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/78767
- ACLU: You have every right to photograph that cop
- Privacy Groups Protest Massive DHS Database of Secret Watchlists
- Cops Use Device to Find Child Porn on Wireless Networks
- Future TSA: Track All ‘Daily Travels To Work, Grocery Stores & Social Events’
- Cybersecurity Solution for Anonymous: Hire Hackers vs. 20 Years Jail Time?
- Banksy had it right: The future holds a mere 15 minutes of anonymity for everyone
- ACLU to Congress: Cancer of Gov’t Secrecy Is Killing America
- You might be a terrorist if you take a photo or film at Mall of America
- Cyberwar & Certified Lies: 531 Spy Certs target CIA, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla
- ISP Customer Sales FAIL: using ‘it’s OK they all invade privacy’ argument
- Terrorism with your pancakes? FBI, DHS, Police Raid 7 IHOP Restaurants
- ACLU on Massive Surveillance Society: Reclaim Privacy, American Liberties
Censored Jesse Ventura Show On FEMA Camps Survives On You Tube
 |
 |
We urge you to watch the videos below because they might not be around for much longer. Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory show about the police state and FEMA camps, which TruTV never re-aired because of constant government harassment and pressure, has already been memory-holed and is now under threat of being removed from You Tube as well.
The show covers the takeover plan and what they don’t want you to see – how martial law is being implemented in America. Get these videos now and share them before they disappear forever.
During his last appearance on the Alex Jones Show, Jesse Ventura confirmed that TruTV was forced to pull the show from their schedule due to government threats.
FLASHBACK: “Police State” episode of hit Ventura show covering FEMA camps pulled from air
Former Gov. Jesse Ventura and his crew at Conspiracy Theory have blown the FEMA camp issue wide open in a truly groundbreaking episode from the program’s second season on TruTV. The “Police State” episode proves once and for all that the feds have trained to take on American citizens, planned for riots and disasters and made preparations to maintain order at any cost. Tune in this Friday, Nov. 12 at 10 PM Eastern/ 9 PM Central and leave the denial at the door.
This powerful episode is the largest and most in-depth investigation into FEMA camps to date– and it is scheduled to air on television. Radio host and filmmaker Alex Jones returns to the series yet again, as the team takes you to confirmed on-the-ground facilities, confronts the legislators who authorized FEMA camps and breaks down the full-scale technologically-integrated police state that includes Fusion Centers, FEMA, the Department of Homeland Security and more.
Stock up for the Holidays with eFoodsDirect and get FREE Shipping! (Ad)
At one of many real and verified FEMA locations, Jesse Ventura and Alex Jones approach a “Residential Center” run by Homeland Security in central Texas where they find locked doors, double-fences and escape warnings around the entire perimeter. Further inside the facility, they witness a playground complex, swings and slides for children. The crew walks up to the front door and attempts to get some answers. But the officials refuse to either confirm or deny the facility’s purpose, including whether or not American citizens are being held inside. However, our past investigations into this facility reveal that it has confined both children and adults, including immigrants, refugee seekers and American citizens.
http://www.infowars.com/censored-jesse-ventura-show-on-fema-camps-survives-on-you-tube/
Ex-CIA: ‘Forged document’ released as birth certificate
Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, the chief of Stand Up America, a national security expert and Fox News contributor, says the 
“Certificate of Live Birth” released in April by the White House as “proof positive” of President Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a “black backlash” if the failings of the nation’s first black president are revealed.
In an interview today with Greg Corombos for WND, Vallely, who previously has expressed concerns about whether the Obama administration is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, said, “His actual birth certificate has never been found in Hawaii nor released from Hawaii hospital there, Kapiolani hospital there, if it in fact did exist.”
“We’ve had three CIA agents, retired, and some of their analytical associates look at it, and all came to the same conclusion, that even the long-form was a forged document,” Vallely said.
Get the New York Times best-seller “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President,” autographed by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.
“No members of Congress will take this on. The word I get out of Washington is that they don’t want to challenge this because it would be in fact a felony offense and in some cases may be even treasonous and [they are] afraid of a black backlash from some of the urban areas,” Vallely said.
“But that’s a very poor excuse for not taking necessary steps to make sure this president in fact is a legitimate president under Article 2 and he is a born U.S. citizen.”
The departments of government designed to uncover wrongdoing, in this case, are on the wrong side, he said.
“I think they’re (the FBI) covering for this administration. I think the corruption within this administration is so proliferated through the agencies of government now, we’re just in a bad situation here. I think the lack of confidence in our government is growing and many feel that not only all the members of Congress but even our courts are corrupted at this time,” he said.
The questions over Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the requirements in the Constitution that call for a “natural born citizen” have been raised since before he was elected.
Numerous lawsuits have been filed and challenges organized but none have uncovered Obama’s documentation. For most of the past few years, his supporters relied on an online image of a Hawaiian short-form “Certification of Live Birth” as proof of his Hawaiian birth, claiming it was the only documentation available from the state.
However, just as the New York Times best-seller, “Where’s the Birth Certificate: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President,” by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., was about to be released, Obama dispatched a private attorney to Hawaii to fetch the supposed long-form “Certificate of Live Birth” and explained that the record now would include the full documentation available from Hawaii.
The original hard-copy birth document, whatever it actually is, has never been seen by the public.
Image released by the White House April 27, 2011
Corsi told WND, “The list is growing of those openly acknowledging the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 is a forgery.
“That former CIA agents are beginning to weigh in on the White House forgery is important. Too many experts remain afraid to speak out about what is an obvious forgery, fearful that openly speaking out against Obama will hurt their income. That Gen. Vallely has now spoken out shows the cracks are widening around the White House façade that the Obama birth certificate is a legitimate document.”
He said, “Vallely is right in saying that millions of Americans are still trying to find out who Barack Obama is.
“The cover-up in Hawaii is still continuing. Every professional forensic document examiner knows the best evidence of the Obama long-form birth certificate is not the electronic Adobe file released on the White House website, but the original document the Hawaii DOH is still hiding in its vault, unwilling to let the public see it with their own eyes. Why won’t the White House allow a team of independent professional forensic document examiners inspect and authenticate the original birth certificate document? It makes no sense — unless of course there is no long-form birth certificate in the Hawaii DOH vault.”
When Obama released the purported long-form certificate, officials in the Hawaii Department of Health and governor’s office refused to simply confirm to WND that the image being presented by Obama was an accurate representation of the records maintained by the state.
Vallely said the document should “thoroughly be analyzed by resident FBI officials and analysts to determine if in fact and validate whether it’s forged or real.”
“One of the apparent flaws in that document was they listed Kenya as the place of birth of Obama’s father, but Kenya was not an established country at that time,” he noted.
“There’s still a lot of controversy about it, and some of us would just like to have this thing clearly authenticated.”
He also cited one of the many issues raised by document experts who have challenged the “birth certificate’s” authenticity – the layering in the Adobe computer file.
And Vallely said he knows some would not be satisfied with anything the Obama administration would release, which is a problem, in itself, for the White House.
“That’s true, because they don’t believe he is eligible. You have a fairly growing contingent out there.”
Vallely also made similar statements in an online radio program in which he supported Lakin, the Army doctor who refused orders because neither the military nor the White House would document Obama’s eligibility. He spent five months in Fort Leavenworth and only recently was released. His comments start at about 3:30 of the YouTube video:
There, Vallely said, “Obama’s birth certificate – I’ve had retired CIA agents and other investigators go over the birth certificate that was produced and by far, 10 out of 10 have said it’s a forgery. So we still have that corruptness going on in the White House. There’s a great number of organizations and people still trying to find out who Barack Obama is, where he was born, what his legitimacy is as president of the United States. We know for sure that the Constitution has been violated in Article 2, particularly when you look at the natural-born status.”
Only one day earlier, officials in the state of Hawaii claimed that the original of the Obama ‘birth certificate’ document – the document posted online by the White House – remains “confidential” and cannot be produced in response to a subpoena in a lawsuit over Obama’s legitimacy.
The image released by Obama has been challenged by a number of document imaging analysts as a fraud, and it doesn’t align with descriptions of it by Obama supporters.
For instance, two weeks before Obama finally released his “long-form birth certificate,” Hawaii’s former Health Department chief Chiyome Fukino – the one official who claimed to have examined the original birth document under lock and key in Hawaii – was interviewed by NBC News’ national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, who reported that Fukino told him she had seen the original birth certificate and that it was “half typed and half handwritten.”
However, the document released by the White House was entirely typed. Only the signatures and two dates at the very bottom were “handwritten.” What Fukino described apparently is a different document from what Obama released to the public
Conspiracy of Silence – Sex Trafficking Linked to Whitehouse
In 1993 a team from Yorkshire Television came to Omaha, Nebraska to document, investigate, and un-cover the mysteries surrounding the Franklin case and the ensuing cover-up. What the team would find through the course of their near year long investigation would ultimately reach to the White House itself, where they found that then Vice-President George H.W. Bush had been implicated in the crimes surrounding the case. The explosive documentary was scheduled to air in 1994 on the Discovery Channel. At the last minute to program was pulled from the airwaves, and to this day has never made to television screens. See the documentary certain interests didn’t want you to see.
Are You Targeted?
Are you targeted?
(Yes, you are.)
“The program”, explained
- It’s a brainwashing program. Brainwashed people don’t know they’re brainwashed.
- The disturbing things you experience are real. The narrative is in your mind.
Your imagination has been primed by a single source, disguising itself as
multiple sources. - Treat this explanation as a hypothesis. Do all the strange happenings
around you seem less disturbing when you assume all the suggestive
performances, loaded conversations, and veiled references to your personal life
are coming from people who have no idea what they’re doing?Look at things a different way. Does it make you feel better? - There is no authoritative source of information about this program or the
underlying tools. Think otherwise? Listen to the podcast.
Sleight of mind
- New tools have added a new dimension to an old game.
- The game: provocation, misdirection, disinformation.
- Numerous “fake” events can be anchored to real events, amplifying
the perceived threat and getting the witness to report outlandish stories. - Individuals whose brain centers are electrically stimulated believe their
evoked actions are their own ideas; their conscious mind rationalizes the
evoked actions away. People experiencing this electrical stimulation aren’t
consciously aware of an external influence. (José Delgado, Physical
control of the mind: toward a psychocivilized society; p. 116.)
Disinformation
- It costs them little to disseminate disinformation, but you’ll find it very
costly. - Disinformation spreads because it gives the recipients what they want.
What you want is vindication, validation, and public acceptance.
Beware information that plays on these desires. - Are you experimenting on them and testing the boundaries of your prison?
Or are they toying with you?
A skeptical look at skepticism
- Real skepticism is great.
- A select group of public relations specialists – and a community of
online bullies – have adopted the language of skepticism to get
what they want. They’re not sincere. Recognize them for what they are. - Distraction and misdirection are the tools of magicians as well as
intelligence agencies. The skeptic community has been put to work
attacking corporate- and government- created straw men, discrediting the
real issues by association; they’ve been played.
Countermeasures
- A very cheap and harmless countermeasure: listening to binaural beats
(alpha, theta, delta waves) on a portable music player with stereo headphones.
Reports indicate this works well with beating sleep deprivation as well as auditory
disturbances. The probable cause is binaural entrainment. Search YouTube
for binaural beat sound tracks. - Whether or not they’re interested in poisoning you; whether or not they’re
interested in breaking in at night; you can take some simple steps to earn
peace of mind and help the fear recede. Try barricading your door at night (if
you think “they” are still getting in, check out the podcast explaining “the
program”, above). Hang on to food receipts – toss them in a waste basket in a
corner. - Shielding integrity: It’s pretty easy to verify the integrity of shielding with cheap equipment.
If you can reduce your cell phone to zero bars, or block reception for a portable
radio, you’re off to a great start.Ordinary window screens can let air pass into a shielded enclosure without
compromising its integrity. - If your enclosure is blocking cell phones / radio transmissions, but it’s
not shielding you, you’re probably bringing the source of your problems inside
the enclosure with you. - Don’t use metal foil. It’s a stereotype, and besides, unless you know exactly
what you’re doing, it’s probably not going to work. You can mix iron filings (or iron
oxide, for a smoother finish) with ordinary paint and coat your walls with it –
the recommended ratio is 4:1 paint-to-iron. Please note that this may not
block broadcast EMF – see the shielding integrity advice, above.
EMF remarks
- Passive shielding is basically a solved problem, but it might not be practical.
You can’t spend your life in a steel coffin. Plus, you don’t know exactly what you’re
shielding against (but you can rule out a lot of possibilities using brute force). - 60+ Ghz EMF is quickly attenuated (blocked) by ordinary
obstacles, including wood and brick. Here’s a CBS News video showing
a reporter blocking the 95 Ghz Active Denial System with a board of
plywood, as well as a mattress. - Starting points to investigate shielding advice (Wikipedia): Electromagnetic
shielding; Skin effect;
Dielectric heating.
Bad science / disinformation
- A frequently-cited article, Mind Fields (Omni Magazine, 1985)
doesn’t say what Nick Begich has led his readers to believe what it says. In
the article, Delgado scoffs at the notion of long-distance EMF attacks, but
Begich doesn’t quote that part of the article. Read it yourself (DJVU viewer
required). - A patent doesn’t mean anything without a working model. Bad patents do slip
past USPTO examiners. - Anybody can claim anything in a lawsuit. A lawsuit filing isn’t proof of anything.
- Reputable scientific journals generally don’t have to announce that they’re
“peer reviewed”; it’s a given. - Electrical pollution: look a lot more closely at the existing studies.
You’re going to find flaws, even in “peer reviewed” studies. Magda Havas’
infamous double-blind heart rate experiment, for example, doesn’t allow for
electrical interference with the measurements of the subjects’ heart rates. - Studies that show correlation – without leading researchers to underlying
causes – have to be dismissed. You see, the truth wears off.
Better terminology
- Where does the terminology you use come from? Do you know? Are you being misled by it?
- Neurotechnology instead of electronic mind control (sounds
fringe) or mind control (ambiguous). Dennis Kuchinich (D-OH) tried to
outlaw psychotronics but that’s his word, not anybody else’s. - Stop labeling everyone you’re bothered by as a perpetrator; do you like
being labeled? But there are going to be players who are “in on it”, such as
assets, operatives, and handlers. - High-tech stalking by proxy instead of organized stalking
(which implies agency). Gang-stalking is okay as slang, but never say
gang stalkers. - Augmented reality instead of holograms.
- Evoked actions or inner voice cloning instead of subliminals.
- Consider describing yourself and those around you as subjects of experimentation
or assets instead of targeted individuals. - Auditory disturbance(s) instead of v2k, which implies a particular
technology is being used. V2K is convenient slang, though, and it’s not going away.
The company you keep (and other tools of coercion)
- You’re being coerced into interacting with certain people.
- You pick up misconceptions from the company you keep: bad science, misleading framing, unreliable testimony.
If you act on those misconceptions, your actions are the product of coercion. - In your search for allies, you’ve lowered your standards. You need to restore them.
Links
- If everyone knew: 5 documented facts that everyone should know;
printable flyers
AMERICAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS
EMA CONCENTRATION CAMPS: Locations and Executive Orders
There over 800 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should Martial Law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached. Ask yourself if you really want to be on Ashcroft’s list.
The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.
Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which will be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper purpose. Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state and thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders already listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for this operation.
The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people.
Now let’s review the justification for any actions taken…
Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:…
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990
allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995
allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997
allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998
allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999
allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000
allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001
Tyrannical “Health Standards” Of The New World Order
As every nation in the world marches forward to a completely integrated and globalized society, the control of food is an absolute necessity for those who seek to accelerate amalgamation. It is for this reason that we see an increase in domestic legislation that mirrors the guidelines and demands of international standard-setting organizations. These attempts at harmonization of national laws, specifically those regarding food, are coming in daily from all sides of the globe.
Whether it’s the GMO fight in the United States, Mexico, and Europe, or the question of the level of vitamins and minerals in supplements, the Biotech Corporations are continually winning most of their battles with the help of mass ignorance, national governments, the World Trade Organization and similar entities.
Indeed, when one begins to examine many of the debates regarding food and food regulation, one name appears over and over – Codex Alimentarius.
For those who may be unaware of what Codex Alimentarius is, I refer you to my book Codex Alimentarius – The End of Health Freedom. Briefly speaking, however, Codex is an agency created under the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO)and thereby functions under direction of the United Nations (UN).
Codex Alimentarius sets the standards by which the World Trade Organization implements its dispute settlements and international trade policies. Codex Guidelines, once agreed upon, are enforced by the WTO and other related treaties. Essentially, Codex sets the standards for the world regarding food, vitamins and minerals, GMO’s, and almost everything else that humans consume.
Although the influence of Codex Alimentarius can be seen the world over, New Zealanders appear to be the latest targets of the international standard-setting organization via a food bill titled Food Bill 160-2.
Similar to legislation recently passed in the United States, the New Zealand Food Bill essentially turns the right to grow food and share it with others into a regulated and controlled privilege. Food Bill 160-2 would also allow for the control of seeds (specifically heirloom seeds), and the creation of Food Safety Officers that would serve to police the newly designated and loosely termed “food producers.” It would also effectively end the ability of individuals to become and remain self-sufficient.
For instance, the bill defines food so as to include any plant or animal (living or dead by the definitions set forth in the bill) intended for human consumption, as well as:
any ingredient or nutrient or other constituent of any food or drink, whether that ingredient or nutrient or other constituent is consumed or represented for consumption on its own by humans, or is used in the preparation of, or mixed with or added to, any food or drink; and anything that is or is intended to be mixed with or added to any food or drink.
Furthermore, giving broad and alarming levels of power to the Governor-General, “anything that is declared by the Governor-General, by Order in Council made under section 355, to be food for the purposes of this Act” will also fall under the jurisdiction of Bill 160-2.
So much is included in just the “Definitions” section of the bill one could almost write a twenty-page article just on the connotations provided by Section 8 alone. Regardless, as one can clearly see from reading the small portion of the bill quoted above, the terms of the bill are all-encompassing.
Herein, food is defined literally as anything that can be consumed by humans and it retains this definition at whatever the stage of its development.
Therefore, corn may be considered food whenever it is being sold at a market. It may be considered food when it is being shucked, and it may be considered food when it is being grown. It is also considered food before being grown — in seed form.
Not only that, but because many seeds themselves are consumed by humans, seeds naturally fall under this tyrannical legislation as much as anything else.
As a result of the new policies to be implemented as a result of Food Bill 160-2, anyone then engaged in producing and distributing food would be subject to the regulation and monitoring of the new authorization program. Of course, the classification of “food producer,” applies to individuals who grow two or three tomato plants for their own consumption as much as it does to major Agri-businesses.
That being said, there are clearly financial concerns with the new bill as well. Obviously, Big-Agra would easily be able to pay the monitoring fees for the new Soviet program while small farmers, where they still exist, could not. In addition, individuals would certainly no longer be able to continue selling their food at the local farmers market, local restaurants, or even to other individuals.
True to form, the questions regarding the new legislation are being brushed off by the New Zealand government, particularly those individuals in the New Zealand government who have been pushing the bill from the start.
For instance, Kate Wilkinson, New Zealand Minister of Food Safety recently stated to Campbell Live that concerns over the Food Bill were part of some kind of “conspiracy theory” and that she didn’t understand where all this “conspiracy theory” was coming from.
Before I continue, I must ask if all this doesn’t sound eerily familiar. It certainly does to me.
Last year, when the United States Congress was busy passing S.510, a bill that was very similar if not identical in scope to the New Zealand Food Bill, we heard the same cat calls of “conspiracy theory” launched at anyone who criticized the impending legislation. Now, in late 2011, after the U.S. government has publicly raided organic food shops, raw milk distributors, and the Amish with guns drawn by clownish looking SWAT teams, the name-calling is a bit harder to justify.
The similarities between the law in the United States and the one being proposed in New Zealand are quite striking, so much in fact that they can scarcely be considered a coincidence — especially when both of these bills are themselves disturbingly similar to Codex Alimentarius Guidelines and recommendations. Indeed, upon closer examination it appears that there is more of a pattern than some members of national governments would have us believe. No doubt this is almost always the case.
But back to Miss “Conspiracy Theory” Kate Wilkinson for a moment. To answer her question as to where all the “conspiracy theories” have come from, perhaps she should look at her own statements.
Indeed, in a letter to Green MP Sue Kedgley, who has expressed some attenuated level of criticism toward the bill, Wilkinson wrote:
The barter or selling of propagation food seeds and food seedlings is in scope [of the Bill] . . . However the sale or exchange of seeds for propagation, and seedlings (whether this occurs in the context of a garden centre, a market, or between those in a community of interest), is not intended to be captured. [emphasis added]
Wilkinson openly admits that seeds can and will be controlled under the new food bill. Hardly a conspiracy theory when the antagonist actually admits it to be true.
Notice also that her pathetic attempt to reassure Kedgley of the harmlessness of the bill is that it is not intended to be used against private citizens who share seeds with one another and their community. Indeed, Wilkinson’s response throughout her letter to Kedgley (pdf) centers around intentions, while, at the same time, openly admits that, “With such broadness, there is inevitably the potential for activities it was never contemplated as ‘in scope’ to be technically captured.”
Of course, before one gets their hopes up in regards to the Green Party, one should bear in mind that politics are politics and the theater of public opinion is much the same in New Zealand as it is in the United States. As New Zealand Food Security reports, the Green Party itself initially voted for this bill. The organization states, “Ignore the [Green Party] blog’s dog-and-pony show propaganda. The Greens, who voted for the Bill at first reading, know the truth is coming out now and are dissembling for extra election votes).” Obviously, the political climate is exactly the same in every country with exactly the same result.
In the end, there should be no mistake as to the goal of these new laws, whether they be in the United States, New Zealand, or anywhere else for that matter. As the world marches faster and faster toward totalitarianism, the ability of individuals to become self-sufficient must be destroyed before the control system can fully assert itself. This, in fact, is an integral part of the system in the first place.
National laws such as S.510 and Food Bill 160-2 are merely the domestic ground-level implementation of international policy handed down from Codex Alimentarius, the World Trade Organization, and the United Nations, entities that are themselves nothing more than tools in the Great Work known as the New World Order.
http://www.infowars.com/tyrannical-health-standards-of-the-new-world-order/
Top Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag
Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.
Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.
Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop, “the basic tenets for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government,” while also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were later employed around the world.
Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked on George W. Bush’s election campaign against Al Gore. His record underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in intelligence circles over the past three decades plus.
The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik.
Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months,” and that the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80′s.
Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, “Not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome,” adding that the US government knew Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan.
Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the sufferer.
“He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the intelligence community knew about it,” said Pieczenik, noting how CIA physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital in Dubai.
“He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already dying, so nobody had to kill him,” added Pieczenik, stating that Bin Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.
“Did the intelligence community or the CIA doctor up this situation, the answer is yes, categorically yes,” said Pieczenik, referring to Sunday’s claim that Bin Laden was killed at his compound in Pakistan, adding, “This whole scenario where you see a bunch of people sitting there looking at a screen and they look as if they’re intense, that’s nonsense,” referring to the images released by the White House which claim to show Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton watching the operation to kill Bin Laden live on a television screen.
“It’s a total make-up, make believe, we’re in an American theater of the absurd….why are we doing this again….nine years ago this man was already dead….why does the government repeatedly have to lie to the American people,” asked Pieczenik.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
“Osama Bin Laden was totally dead, so there’s no way they could have attacked or confronted or killed Osama Bin laden,” said Pieczenik, joking that the only way it could have happened was if special forces had attacked a mortuary.
Pieczenik said that the decision to launch the hoax now was made because Obama had reached a low with plummeting approval ratings and the fact that the birther issue was blowing up in his face.
“He had to prove that he was more than American….he had to be aggressive,” said Pieczenik, adding that the farce was also a way of isolating Pakistan as a retaliation for intense opposition to the Predator drone program, which has killed hundreds of Pakistanis.
“This is orchestrated, I mean when you have people sitting around and watching a sitcom, basically the operations center of the White House, and you have a president coming out almost zombie-like telling you they just killed Osama Bin Laden who was already dead nine years ago,” said Pieczenik, calling the episode, “the greatest falsehood I’ve ever heard, I mean it was absurd.”
Dismissing the government’s account of the assassination of Bin Laden as a “sick joke” on the American people, Pieczenik said, “They are so desperate to make Obama viable, to negate the fact that he may not have been born here, any questions about his background, any irregularities about his background, to make him look assertive….to re-elect this president so the American public can be duped once again.”
Pieczenik’s assertion that Bin Laden died almost ten years ago is echoed by numerous intelligence professionals as well as heads of state across the world.
Bin Laden, “Was used in the same way that 9/11 was used to mobilize the emotions and feelings of the American people in order to go to a war that had to be justified through a narrative that Bush junior created and Cheney created about the world of terrorism,” stated Pieczenik.
During his interview with the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Pieczenik also asserted he was directly told by a prominent general that 9/11 was a stand down and a false flag operation, and that he is prepared to go to a grand jury to reveal the general’s name.
“They ran the attacks,” said Pieczenik, naming Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Stephen Hadley, Elliott Abrams, and Condoleezza Rice amongst others as having been directly involved.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad);
“It was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses….it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz – I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open,” said Pieczenik, adding that he was “furious” and “knew it had happened”.
“I taught stand down and false flag operations at the national war college, I’ve taught it with all my operatives so I knew exactly what was done to the American public,” he added.
Pieczenik re-iterated that he was perfectly willing to reveal the name of the general who told him 9/11 was an inside job in a federal court, “so that we can unravel this thing legally, not with the stupid 9/11 Commission that was absurd.”
Pieczenik explained that he was not a liberal, a conservative or a tea party member, merely an American who is deeply concerned about the direction in which his country is heading.
Watch the full interview with Dr. Pieczenik below.
http://www.infowars.com/top-us-government-insider-bin-laden-died-in-2001-911-a-false-flag/
How Google ‘Android’ Killed Net Neutrality
“Why I Hate Android”
Why do I hate Android? It’s definitely one of the questions I get asked most often these days. And most of those that don’t ask probably assume it’s because I’m an iPhone guy. People see negative take after negative take about the operating system and label me as “unreasonable” or “biased” or worse.
I should probably explain.
Believe it or not, I actually don’t hate Android. That is to say, I don’t hate the concept of Android — in fact, at one point, I loved it. What I hate is what Android has become. And more specifically, what Google has done with Android.
Let’s turn back the clock. In 2006, the mobile landscape in the United States was almost unfathomably shitty. Motorola’s RAZR had been the top-selling device for something ridiculous like five straight years — and the only thing that didn’t suck about it was its physical size. The carriers completely controlled the industry. This cannot be overstated.
Then on January 9, 2007 — exactly 5 years ago today — Steve Jobs took the stage at Macworld to unveil the iPhone. Six months later it was released. While some laughed it off at the time, the mobile landscape completely changed.
Apple and Google were great allies at the time. They united over a common enemy: Microsoft. Then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt was even on Apple’s board of directors. Google was a huge part of original iPhone OS (before it was called iOS): Google Maps, YouTube, Google Search, etc. Apple could have launched the iPhone without Google, but it wouldn’t have been as good. And if they had to do something like build their own maps from scratch, it would have taken longer.
A few months later, on November 5, 2007, Google teamed up with many of the big players in the mobile/telecom space to announce the Open Handset Alliance. At the time it sounded promising, but perhaps it should have been the first warning sign. The first product of this partnership: Android. A beta was released, but it would take almost another year before the software was actually ready to go.
The initial Android prototypes looked a lot like BlackBerry devices (both in hardware and software). But the first device (the G1) and OS actually released was more of a cross between a T-Mobile Sidekick (which Android head Andy Rubin helped create while still a co-founder at Danger) and the iPhone OS.
In hindsight, Steve Jobs was clearly not happy about this and the subsequent iPhone-ification of Android. But great artists steal, etc, etc. The only thing I didn’t like about Android at the time was that it was a shitty copy of the iPhone. It was something you couldn’t pay me to use. And most people seemed to feel the same way.
Jobs probably didn’t say much at the time because he didn’t have to. The market was saying it.
Time went on and it was pretty clear that despite the major players involved in the OHA, Android wasn’t getting a lot of traction. Meanwhile, the iPhone, after a price-cut and addition of 3G technology, was soaring. So Google did the logical thing, they went to see Verizon, the largest U.S. carrier, and struck a deal.
Remember, Apple still had an agreement with AT&T for exclusive iPhone rights in the U.S. at the time. Verizon and Google needed each other. But Google clearly needed Verizon more. This was the first real problem. A deal with the devil was struck.
Let’s back up for a second.
Even before Android’s launch, Google clearly had big dreams for the mobile space. “Your mobile phone should be free,” Eric Schmidt told Reuters in late 2006. He envisioned a world in which consumers didn’t have to pay for their mobile phones — advertising (served by Google, naturally) would subsidize the cost. And we’re not talking “free” with a two-year carrier contract. We’re talking free free.
In the pre-iPhone world this may have sounded like crazy-talk. But remember, as an Apple board member and having purchased Android for Google in 2005, Schmidt knew what was coming down the pipe. He absolutely intended to disrupt the mobile market.
But again, the initial releases of Android simply didn’t have the traction needed to come close to fulfilling Schmidt’s (and Google’s) dream. So deals with the carriers had to be made.
Still, Google hung on to the hope of a free phone. That phone was called the Nexus One.
At an event in January of 2010, Google unveiled their plan for Nexus One — the first real “Google Phone” as it were. While they were cautious and cagey with some details, the goal seemed clear: Google intended to blow up the carrier market (in the U.S. first) by moving phone distribution online, flattening it in the process. The idea was that you’d go to a website and pick the phone you wanted, then pick the carrier you wanted, pay, and you’d be done.
Think about this for a second. Instead of going to the store of a single carrier and having a dozen shitty phones shoved in your face by salespeople that made commission, you’d be in total control of the process. The end result of consumers getting to choose their carriers (and phones and plans) was clear: major competition and subsequently a rush of better deals from said carriers to ensure customer activation and retention.
Or, you could buy whatever phone you wanted unlocked. Eventually, pay-as-you-go SIM cards would pop up in the U.S. as a result.
This was to be the dawn of the golden age of mobile in this country. As I wrote at the time: Apple And Google Just Tag Teamed The U.S. Carriers. I loved it.
But it was never meant to be.
What should have been obvious at the time but for whatever reason wasn’t (maybe because carrier representatives were at the event), the carriers hated this plan. And for good reason — it was going to turn them into dumb pipes that competed on price. There was no way they were going to let this fly, and they didn’t. Within a few months, citing weak sales of the Nexus One, Google scrapped their ambitious website and instead got fully in bed with the carriers.
But there was more.
What no one knew at the time, and I only heard months later, was Google’s original vision for the Nexus One. Google intended to sell it for $99 without a contract and unlocked. Yes, a $99 unlocked phone, subsidized by Google ads.
But the plan had one little problem: Google didn’t operate their own cellular network. They needed Verizon or AT&T or Sprint or T-Mobile to help them out. Google probably thought their open spectrum deal “win” in early 2008 gave them the leverage they needed here. Sadly, it did not.
All of the carriers laughed in Google’s face when presented with the ambitious Nexus One plan. And given that Google had just signed the all-important deal with Verizon, it was never going to happen.
So instead, at the Nexus One launch we got a website where you could indeed buy an unlocked Android phone — for $529. Nonstarter.
Better yet, while they said they were committed at the time, Verizon and Sprint never even got around to supporting the Nexus One at all. That’s how much they were behind the project.
To complicate matters further, behind the scenes, Verizon and Google were arguing over Net Neutrality rules. Verizon was opposed, Google was in favor. Then a funny thing happened. Google started supporting Verizon’s viewpoint on the matter! If you’re looking for the first post where I’m really, truly, pissed off at Google, look no further.
It. Was. Total. Fucking. Bullshit.
A few months later, guess what happened? Thanks to the Google/Verizon alliance on the matter, the FCC decided the compromised vision of Net Neutrality was just fine also. To be clear: Net Neutrality was thrown out in the wireless space because Google sided with Verizon’s ridiculous and horribly conflicted stance on the matter.
The open spectrum enemy, turned Net Neutrality enemy, became Google’s bedmate thanks to a business deal. Straight up. Greed, for lack of a better word, is good.
We got all of this thanks to Google’s desire for Android to take over the world. I commented earlier that they signed a deal with the devil — I wasn’t being facetious. They actually did! And they got away with it!
I think about these things everyday that I see positive news about Android. It’s so wonderful that the platform which helped cripple Net Neutrality and is keeping the evil carriers in control is taking off. Make no mistake: Android is now the carriers’ best friend.
Because Google sloppily decided to do the Motorola deal (driven by the full-on patent war, for which Apple and Microsoft, and not Google, are largely to blame), and because the model isn’t great for all but the biggest player, now the OEMs may be our best hope against the carrier/Android alliance.
Eventually, many of them will try to do their own thing (perhaps even using Android as a base) because they’re not idiots, they see where the real money is: controlling the entire experience. Like Apple.
All of this backstory knowledge fuels my rage. When I see Google talk about how “open” the platform is, setting it up as the foil to the “closed” (and framed as “evil”) iPhone, I want to scream and rip someone’s head off. It’s not only the most extreme example of being disingenuous that I can ever recall seeing — it’s nuclear bullshit.
Apple, for all the shit they get for being “closed” and “evil”, has actually done far more to wrestle control back from the carriers and put it into the hands of consumers. Google set off to help in this goal, then stabbed us all in the back and went the complete other way, to the side of the carriers. And because they smiled the entire time they were doing it and fed us this “open” bullshit, we thanked them for it. We’re still thanking them for it!
When you think about it in the context of this election season we’re entering, it’s a brilliant political maneuver that Google has pulled off with Android. They’ve taken something they’ve done that’s actually bad for us and spun it in such a way that most people actually buy into it being good for us.
And for the carriers, Android is the best thing ever because it’s the new “opiate for the masses”. Everything shitty they’re doing is great because they’re doing it with Android — at least it’s not iOS. What a load of horseshit.
I realize that the Android team at Google has a lot of good people doing great work. I know some of them. I respect them. But I cannot respect their decision to continue to work on this platform that perpetuates our imprisonment. I have to believe most simply chose not to think about these things. But they should. They really should.
There’s no denying that there are upsides to open — a lot of them. But in the case of Android, “open” has been hijacked and wildly contorted so as to mask the shady side of what’s really been going on. And it’s working.
So that, ladies and gentleman, is why I hate Android. It has nothing to do with the actual product (which continues to improve every year and is quite good now). It has to do with a promise that was broken and swept under the rug.
As crazy as it may sound to some of you, beyond a full OEM revolt (which could ultimately benefit the carriers as well), our hope now lies with Apple and Microsoft.
Apple, because they put the consumer first and have proven time and time again that they will not bend to carrier bullshit and will often work against them behind the scenes. And they control the all-important Apple stores for distribution (and, of course, the App Store).
Microsoft, because they have a model (many handsets on all carriers) that can potentially scale better than Apple’s can while still giving control (mostly) to the users. And they have Nokia on board with their plan. And they have intersections with products like Xbox. (Though it may be too late in the U.S.)
Perhaps more people will relate to this: I hate Android for the same reason that Severus Snape hates Harry Potter — the very sight reminds me of something so beautiful, that was taken. Except it’s worse. It’s as if Harry Potter has grown up to become Voldemort.
EARTH: Space Station Orbit Timelapse
Editing: Michael König | koenigm.com
Shooting locations in order of appearance:
1. Aurora Borealis Pass over the United States at Night
2. Aurora Borealis and eastern United States at Night
3. Aurora Australis from Madagascar to southwest of Australia
4. Aurora Australis south of Australia (more…)
Gaddafi’s Libya: What The West Doesn’t Want You To Know
Is it possible that Gaddafi was finally making progress towards ending conflict and unifying Africa? What if there was more to this story than THE NEWS is willing to portray? Look closely to see if there may be an agenda at work..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXQxTv3nB14
Do you think the people of Libya are truly thankful for NATO’s intervention? (more…)
WAR 2.0: Powerful Remix with Beastie Boys ft. Edwin Starr
WAR – What is it good for!?
Hollywood Predicts Monsanto Empire: Soylent Green, 1973
In the year 2022, earth’s face has completely changed. New York’s population, has grown to 40 million hungry mouths. The greenhouse effect has risen the temperature into nearly unbearable regions, and the people are kept in the cities by law. The rich live in separated luxury apartments (with women as part of the rented furniture) but also experience the lack of natural food. Strawberries are valued at $150 per glass. Police Detective Thorn investigates a strange murder case of an official from the Soylent corporation, which feeds the masses with a palette of their creations: Soylent red, yellow, or, even more nutritious, green.
Quantum Levitation: A Step Towards Consumer Anti-Gravity?
Friction-less propulsion has been the wet-dream of the Military-Industrial-Complex for at least 100 years. Needless to say they figured it out and have been exploiting it for at least the last 50. Why are we only seeing this now..? We’re supposed to believe that a University discovered this before a Black Budget in the Multi-Trillions per year?
Few motifs of science fiction cinema have been more appealing to us than the subtle defiance of gravity offered by futuristic hovercraft. So every once in a while we check in to see how humanity is progressing on that front, and whether the promise of hoverboards will be delivered by 2015 as evidenced in Back to the Future Part 2. We’re not quite there yet, but we’re definitely getting off the ground, so to speak.
Get ready to hover your brain around the art of quantum levitation. (more…)
THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd7zClv5obw&w=640&h=360
“THRIVE lifts the veil on what’s REALLY going on in our world by following the money upstream — uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
http://areyoutargeted.com/